Home > Copyfight
AUTHORS

Donna Wentworth
( Archive | Home | Technorati Profile)

Ernest Miller
( Archive | Home )

Elizabeth Rader
( Archive | Home )

Jason Schultz
( Archive | Home )

Wendy Seltzer
( Archive | Home | Technorati Profile )

Aaron Swartz
( Archive | Home )

Alan Wexelblat
( Archive | Home )


Support Bloggers' Rights!
Support Bloggers' Rights!

About this weblog
Here we'll explore the nexus of legal rulings, Capitol Hill policy-making, technical standards development, and technological innovation that creates -- and will recreate -- the networked world as we know it. Among the topics we'll touch on: intellectual property conflicts, technical architecture and innovation, the evolution of copyright, private vs. public interests in Net policy-making, lobbying and the law, and more.

Disclaimer: the opinions expressed in this weblog are those of the authors and not of their respective institutions.

What Does "Copyfight" Mean?

Copyfight, the Solo Years: April 2002-March 2004

COPYFIGHTERS
a Typical Joe
Academic Copyright
Jack Balkin
John Perry Barlow
Benlog
beSpacific
bIPlog
Blogaritaville
Blogbook IP
BoingBoing
David Bollier
James Boyle
Robert Boynton
Brad Ideas
Ren Bucholz
Cabalamat: Digital Rights
Cinema Minima
CoCo
Commons-blog
Consensus @ Lawyerpoint
Copyfighter's Musings
Copyfutures
Copyright Readings
Copyrighteous
CopyrightWatch Canada
Susan Crawford
Walt Crawford
Creative Commons
Cruelty to Analog
Culture Cat
Deep Links
Derivative Work
Detritus
Julian Dibbell
DigitalConsumer
Digital Copyright Canada
Displacement of Concepts
Downhill Battle
DTM:<|
Electrolite
Exploded Library
Bret Fausett
Edward Felten - Freedom to Tinker
Edward Felten - Dashlog
Frank Field
Seth Finkelstein
Brian Flemming
Frankston, Reed
Free Culture
Free Range Librarian
Michael Froomkin
Michael Geist
Michael Geist's BNA News
Dan Gillmor
Mike Godwin
Joe Gratz
GrepLaw
James Grimmelmann
GrokLaw
Groklaw News
Matt Haughey
Erik J. Heels
ICANNWatch.org
Illegal-art.org
Induce Act blog
Inter Alia
IP & Social Justice
IPac blog
IPTAblog
Joi Ito
Jon Johansen
JD Lasica
LawMeme.org
Legal Theory Blog
Lenz Blog
Larry Lessig
Jessica Litman
James Love
Alex Macgillivray
Madisonian Theory
Maison Bisson
Kevin Marks
Tim Marman
Matt Rolls a Hoover
miniLinks
Mary Minow
Declan McCullagh
Eben Moglen
Dan Moniz
Napsterization
Nerdlaw
NQB
Danny O'Brien
Open Access
Open Codex
John Palfrey
Chris Palmer
Promote the Progress
PK News
PVR Blog
Eric Raymond
Joseph Reagle
Recording Industry vs. the People
Lisa Rein
Thomas Roessler
Seth Schoen
Doc Searls
Seb's Open Research
Shifted Librarian
Doug Simpson
Slapnose
Slashdot.org
Stay Free! Daily
Sarah Stirland
Swarthmore Coalition
Tech Law Advisor
Technology Liberation Front
Teleread
Siva Vaidhyanathan
Vertical Hold
Kim Weatherall
Weblogg-ed
David Weinberger
Matthew Yglesias

LINKABLE + THINKABLE
AKMA
Timothy Armstrong
Bag and Baggage
Charles Bailey
Beltway Blogroll
Between Lawyers
Blawg Channel
bk
Chief Blogging Officer
Drew Clark
Chris Cohen
Crawlspace
Crooked Timber
Daily Whirl
Dead Parrots Society
Delaware Law Office
J. Bradford DeLong
Betsy Devine
Dispositive
Ben Edelman
EEJD
Ernie the Attorney
FedLawyerGuy
Foreword
How Appealing
Industry Standard
IP Democracy
IPnewsblog
IP Watch
Dennis Kennedy
Rick Klau
Wendy Koslow
Kuro5hin.org
Elizabeth L. Lawley
Jerry Lawson
Legal Reader
Likelihood of Confusion
Chris Locke
Derek Lowe
Misbehaving
MIT Tech Review
NewsGrist
OtherMag
Paper Chase
Frank Paynter
PHOSITA
Scott Rosenberg
Scrivener's Error
Jeneane Sessum
Silent Lucidity
Smart Mobs
Trademark Blog
Eugene Volokh
Kevin Werbach

ORGANIZATIONS
ARL
Berkman @ Harvard
CDT
Chilling Effects
CIS @ Stanford
CPSR
Copyright Reform
Creative Commons
DigitalConsumer.org
DFC
EFF
EPIC
FIPR
FCC
FEPP
FSF
Global Internet Proj.
ICANN
IETF
ILPF
Info Commons
IP Justice
ISP @ Yale
NY for Fair Use
Open Content
PFF
Public Knowledge
Shidler Center @ UW
Tech Center @ GMU
U. Maine Tech Law Center
US Copyright Office
US Dept. of Justice
US Patent Office
W3C


RECENT COMMENTS [xml]
› carte psn gratuit on
The Gospels of Publishing

› Hacks Game of War Fire Age on
The Gospels of Publishing

› ebook writing service on
I Swear I'm Going to Make a New Blog Category

› Darwin Cellular on
Cell Phone Unlocking (yawn)

› Jenny on
Creativity and Copyfight

› J. S. Greenfield on
Performance Rights, Aereo, and the Cloud

Recent Trackbacks
April 2014 (2)
March 2014 (12)
February 2014 (17)
January 2014 (12)
December 2013 (22)
November 2013 (12)
October 2013 (14)
September 2013 (20)
August 2013 (17)
July 2013 (18)
June 2013 (20)
May 2013 (30)
April 2013 (18)
March 2013 (15)
February 2013 (18)
January 2013 (29)
December 2012 (25)
November 2012 (16)
October 2012 (29)
September 2012 (10)
August 2012 (22)
July 2012 (22)
June 2012 (21)
May 2012 (25)
April 2012 (18)
March 2012 (23)
February 2012 (23)
January 2012 (17)
December 2011 (19)
November 2011 (5)
October 2011 (10)
September 2011 (11)
August 2011 (15)
July 2011 (4)
June 2011 (15)
May 2011 (5)
April 2011 (8)
March 2011 (8)
February 2011 (6)
January 2011 (6)
December 2010 (2)
November 2010 (2)
October 2010 (8)
September 2010 (3)
August 2010 (6)
July 2010 (11)
June 2010 (11)
May 2010 (5)
April 2010 (12)
March 2010 (10)
February 2010 (10)
January 2010 (15)
December 2009 (3)
November 2009 (9)
October 2009 (4)
September 2009 (3)
August 2009 (10)
July 2009 (5)
June 2009 (6)
May 2009 (6)
April 2009 (5)
March 2009 (6)
February 2009 (7)
January 2009 (4)
December 2008 (13)
November 2008 (4)
October 2008 (12)
September 2008 (7)
August 2008 (7)
July 2008 (1)
June 2008 (7)
May 2008 (4)
April 2008 (7)
March 2008 (9)
February 2008 (16)
January 2008 (14)
December 2007 (9)
November 2007 (8)
October 2007 (7)
September 2007 (14)
August 2007 (19)
July 2007 (10)
June 2007 (14)
May 2007 (11)
April 2007 (4)
March 2007 (4)
February 2007 (9)
December 2006 (3)
November 2006 (11)
October 2006 (6)
September 2006 (5)
August 2006 (6)
July 2006 (2)
June 2006 (11)
May 2006 (18)
April 2006 (15)
March 2006 (15)
February 2006 (18)
January 2006 (7)
December 2005 (16)
November 2005 (41)
October 2005 (60)
September 2005 (52)
August 2005 (82)
July 2005 (56)
June 2005 (115)
May 2005 (89)
April 2005 (150)
March 2005 (177)
February 2005 (101)
January 2005 (58)
December 2004 (58)
November 2004 (32)
October 2004 (49)
September 2004 (44)
August 2004 (52)
July 2004 (83)
June 2004 (61)
May 2004 (55)
April 2004 (61)
March 2004 (62)



Subscribe with Bloglines




Creative Commons License
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline


Copyfight

January 28, 2005
Why EFF Is Fighting AppleEmail This EntryPrint This Entry
Posted by Donna Wentworth

As a follow-up to our previous discussion in this space about Apple's subpoena requests to a number of Mac-centric news blogs, check out this post by Kurt Opsahl, the EFF lawyer working to protect the blog publishers:


As the courts have confirmed, what makes journalism journalism is not the format but the content. Where news is gathered for dissemination to the public, it is journalism -- regardless of whether it is printed on paper or distributed through the Internet.

[...]

Blogs gain in importance and readership by the content and currency of their news, not their affiliations with the media of old. Indeed, we've seen numerous cases where blogs break the news first, and traditional media follow. Bloggers hammered on the Trent Lott story until mainstream media was forced to pick it up again. Three amateur journalists at the Powerline.com blog were primarily responsible for discrediting the documents used in CBS's rush-to-air story on President George Bush's National Guard service. And the list goes on.

If Apple's subpoenas to Apple Insider, PowerPage and Think Secret are allowed to proceed and the Apple news sites EFF is representing are forced to disclose the confidences gained by their reporters, potential confidential sources will be deterred from providing information to the online media, and the public will lose a vital outlet for independent news, analysis, and commentary. We can't let that happen.


Category: Speech


COMMENTS
Chidi O on January 29, 2005 03:31 AM writes...

Is freedom of speech limitless?

Are corporations always bad and individuals good?

Why do Non Disclosure Agreements exist?

Are rumour sites directly or indirectly involved in industrial espionage?

Do rumour sites provide news or online entertainment with news as a secondary bi-product?

In what category of journalism can Think Secret's open sollicitation for Apple Computer's trade secrets be placed?

What is the comparative relationship between the Trent Lott story, the George Bush's National Guard Duty story and Think Secret's premature revelation of Apple's product?

I think this case is infinitely more complex than a lot of people imagine.

Permalink to Comment
John Greenwald on January 29, 2005 11:33 AM writes...

What seems to be overlooked in all the rhetoric over Apple's alleged assault on free speech is that another right is in jeopardy here that no one seems willing to defend. Think Secret launched a direct assault on the Non Disclosure Agreement.

If Think Secret prevails in its legal efforts, NDLs will be dead. No company will be willing to enter into an agreement in which the other party can use the free speech loophole to violate the agreement.

If NDLs are destroyed, innovation will be hampered because companies will be forced to hold information more tightly and won't be able to collaborate with third parties without fear of losing trade secrets.

It seems to me that Think Secret and other bloggers are fully capable of doing their job without stepping over the NDL line. As far as I can tell, that is all Apple is asking.

I suspect the republic will remain standing if we have to wait a few extra weeks to know about Apple's new product releases.

Permalink to Comment
Bumper on January 29, 2005 01:27 PM writes...

I offer this response to Chidi O as an ultra right wing, Apple stockholder, who was lucky enough to purchase one of the first 60,000 macs and have never looked back. That said sometimes Apple’s legal department is so full of shit that all you can do is hand them a case of toilet paper and wait until they get back from the outhouse.

Chidi O on January 29, 2005 03:31 AM writes...

Is freedom of speech limitless?

Of course not, you can’t stand up in a crowded theater and yell “Fire” or print/say that so-and-so is a no good sob if he isn’t, and now that you can’t say you hate someone if they are members of a protected group.

Are corporations always bad and individuals good?

Corporations are legal definitions of groups of people for financial reasons. It is the people that make the corporation good or bad. That said there are some people who believe that all corporations are bad.

Why do Non Disclosure Agreements exist?

To keep the second party, who signed the the NDA, from telling others about whatever it is the first party is revealing to them. Note: there are times when a NDA is not legally binding, such as if the first party is committing a crime the second party is duty bound to “blow the whistle” lest they become part of the criminal activity.

Are rumour sites directly or indirectly involved in industrial espionage?

No more than Woodward and Bernstein were involved in political espionage.

Do rumour sites provide news or online entertainment with news as a secondary bi-product?

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, I got great enjoyment out of the news that Bill Gates got a pie in the face.

In what category of journalism can Think Secret's open sollicitation for Apple Computer's trade secrets be placed?

Unless Nom de Plume held a gun to someone’s head or broke into their house/car/office to learn these tidbits, i.e., he broke a criminal law, this was simple news gathering. Apple has, on the other hand, a matter of civil law, i.e., they have a contract (NDA) with someone, a someone who they are trying to force a third party, Nom de Plume, who has no contract with, to reveal to them, Apple.

What is the comparative relationship between the Trent Lott story, the George Bush's National Guard Duty story and Think Secret's premature revelation of Apple's product?

Other than they were stories that were reported via various forms of news media - none. The answer you are apparently seeking to elicit is that the way these stories were slanted affected the way the were perceived by readers. Oh, and while the first was true, it was overblown, the second was apparently not true and lucky for Thicksecret, the third was true!

I think this case is infinitely more complex than a lot of people imagine.

Not really, unless Nom de Plume signed a NDA with Apple they have no, repeat NO, case against him. If Apple has a problem with someone who signed a NDA with them let them do their own damn industrial espionage!

Permalink to Comment
Rad Geek on January 30, 2005 04:17 PM writes...

Again, let's kill this one dead and stomp on it until we're sure:

"If Think Secret prevails in its legal efforts, NDLs will be dead. No company will be willing to enter into an agreement in which the other party can use the free speech loophole to violate the agreement."

Apple never entered into a Non-Disclosure Agreement with Think Secret. It entered into an NDA with unknown second parties who breached the agreement to leak a story to Think Secret. Apple has legally enforceable claims against those second parties if it can find out who they are. It has no claims whatever against Think Secret, which never made any agreement not to broadcast whatever information came into its grubby little hands and has not violated any terms that it ever agreed to.

Apple has no right to enforce the terms of a contract on people who never signed it. They are using this suit as an intimidation tactic to try to force Think Secret to disclose the second parties who leaked the information. Since they have no case, this is nothing more than using the force of the law as an implement of bullying. Thank goodness someone is standing up for Think Secret's right not to be victimized by frivolous legal intimidation.

Permalink to Comment


TRACKBACKS
TrackBack URL: http://www.corante.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/8575
Why EFF Is Fighting Apple from Nostalgic Rumblings From Copyfight: The Electronics Freedom Foundation is taking the cause of three blogs/newssites attacked by the computer maker for providing to the public information on future product offerings. Why EFF Is Fighting Apple: Corante >Why the EFF is figh... [Read More]

Tracked on January 28, 2005 11:24 PM




POST A COMMENT
Name:

Email:

URL:

Comments:

Remember personal info?



EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND
Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES