About this weblog
Here we'll explore the nexus of legal rulings, Capitol Hill
policy-making, technical standards development, and technological
innovation that creates -- and will recreate -- the networked world as we
know it. Among the topics we'll touch on: intellectual property
conflicts, technical architecture and innovation, the evolution of
copyright, private vs. public interests in Net policy-making, lobbying
and the law, and more.
Disclaimer: the opinions expressed in this weblog are those of the authors and not of their respective institutions.
What Does "Copyfight" Mean?
Copyfight, the Solo Years: April 2002-March 2004
1. Sarah on April 2, 2004 10:31 PM writes...
yes, probably, which is why they'll probably start posting signs banning people from bringing that equipment in with them.
Permalink to Comment2. Ernest Miller on April 2, 2004 10:33 PM writes...
This is California. MLB will get a law passed making a felony to bring a videocamera into a baseball stadium.
Permalink to Comment3. AdamThomas on April 3, 2004 2:09 AM writes...
Too easy. CameraPhones to VideoCamera phones to...well I expect something more insidious than an all-out ban - look for maximum resolution limitations on optical recording devices.
Permalink to Comment4. anonymous troll on April 7, 2004 8:09 AM writes...
Xeni Jardin at a ball game?
Yeah, right.
Hypothetical Questions deserve hypothetical answers.
Permalink to Comment5. anonymous on April 9, 2004 9:54 PM writes...
A videophone would be a great asset with the work I do. I am frequently completing job analyses to provide to physicians. It would be more efficient to be able to show a 30 second clip instead, provided I could turn on the videophone in a medical facility.
Permalink to Comment