This thoughtful piece by Robin Cook Peek is a must-read for two reasons: it serves as a useful nutshell description of the battle for open access to scholarly publishing and as a demonstration of its urgency. The news hook is that publishing giant Reed Elsevier has decided to allow authors who publish in its scholarly journals to "self-archive" -- specifically, "to post his version of the final paper on his personal website and on his institution's website." Provided, that is, that the final paper is an MS his own word document or text file rather than HTML or PDF downloaded from the official website.
Peter Suber, a leader in the Open Access movement, calls this "the breakthrough that it seems to be." While it may not provide scholars worldwide with the most ready, optimal access to the final, peer-reviewed piece, it nevertheless remains possible for the dedicated student to find, use and cite these materials. At the same time, however, it falls short of the definition for open access formulated by the Budapest Open Access Initiative, which advocates for the "free availability on the public Internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the Internet itself."
Suber is following minutely the discussion flowing from the Elsevier decision, and along the way offers valuable insight on the current state of play. If you haven't already, hop on over to Open Access News and check it out.
1. joe on June 7, 2004 1:41 PM writes...
I thought this was a big deal (having published with Elsevier recently) as it meant I was no longer in the wrong (my article is posted on my website in final PDF form)... however, now that I see that the two options are text or M$ Word, I suppose I'm still in the wrong. I refuse to post anything in proprietary formats (PDF is *not* proprietary as the spec is open and easily browsable) and the only text version that would be useful would be the LaTeX Source... and that would only be useable by geeks like me.
Permalink to Comment2. Carina on June 7, 2004 2:23 PM writes...
An author may post his version of the final paper on his personal Web site and on his institution's Web site (including its institutional repository). Each posting should include the article's citation and a link to the journal's home page (or the article's DOI), stated Karen Hunter, Elsevier vice president for strategy. The author does not need our permission to do this, but any other posting (e.g., to a repository elsewhere) would require our permission. By his version we are referring to his Word or Tex file, not a PDF or HTML downloaded from ScienceDirectbut the author can update his version to reflect changes made during the refereeing and editing process.
So they the restriction they're imposing is on source, not format. As long as the PDF is generated from your own file, it's fine.
Permalink to Comment