« Surprise! Competitive Enterprise Institute Finds INDUCE Act Anti-Competitive |
Main
| Same Blawg Time, New Blawg Channel »
July 21, 2004
Software vs. Music Infringement
Posted by Ernest Miller
MIT's Technology Review makes an important point regarding software vs. music/movie copyright infringement (Can Peer-to-Peer Stop Software Piracy?). If you're downloading warez, you never know what you're installing on your system. Could be the game you want, could be a trojan. There are no guarantees. This means that software is better positioned to fight internet infringement.
On its face, offering to sell a piece of software in a forum where users can obtain the same product for free sounds like a futile endeavor. However, the illicit nature and reputation of these networks makes these sales more likely. Heres why: With the possibility for viruses so high when downloading a piece of software from these networks, consumers may be more likely to purchase software from a trusted source. If youre an intellectual property owner, you have to make it as easy to legitimately acquire your product as it is to swipe it, says Garland. People dont care if an MP3 file is Sony sanctioned. But if youre going to do your [finances] with a piece of software, you want to get the real McCoy.
So, explain to me again why the
BSA is so pumped up about the
Inducing Infringement of Copyrights Act (IICA, née
INDUCE Act) again.
via JD Lasica
Comments (2)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Misc.
- RELATED ENTRIES
- Apple Jumps Into iBooks - With Hobnailed Boots
- On the Dissent in Golan v Holder
- Jonathan Coulton on Megaupload/Piracy
- Stallman on E-Book Evils & Privacy
- Admin Update
- Joe Konrath Claims USD 100,000 E-book Profits in Jan
- Nate Anderson vs the MPAA
- SF vs SF Ideas
1. Ian on July 22, 2004 9:05 AM writes...
I have a slightly offtopic question,
When did piracy become another word for copyright infringement? Copyright violaters dont sail the 7 ISPs stealing copyrighted materials, well unless your the BSA or RIAA and claim that copyright infringement is stealing, which it legally isn't, right? By using the word piracy are we not reinforcing the concept that copyright infringement is theft? I'm not trying to change things...yet, just curious, and thought maybe this community would be able to give me an idea.
Thanks,
Permalink to Comment-Ian
2. Matt Brubeck on July 22, 2004 11:58 AM writes...
"When did piracy become another word for copyright infringement?"
Quite a long time ago. I don't have an Oxford English Dictionary at my desk, but Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) [dict.org] says:
Pirate \Pi"rate\, v. t. To publish, as books or writings, without the permission of the author.
http://www.dict.org/bin/Dict?Form=Dict2&Database=web1913&Query=pirate
Permalink to Comment