About this weblog
Here we'll explore the nexus of legal rulings, Capitol Hill
policy-making, technical standards development, and technological
innovation that creates -- and will recreate -- the networked world as we
know it. Among the topics we'll touch on: intellectual property
conflicts, technical architecture and innovation, the evolution of
copyright, private vs. public interests in Net policy-making, lobbying
and the law, and more.
Disclaimer: the opinions expressed in this weblog are those of the authors and not of their respective institutions.
What Does "Copyfight" Mean?
Copyfight, the Solo Years: April 2002-March 2004
1. Tim C Koppang on November 21, 2004 5:49 PM writes...
I'm a little confused. Why did he actually pay the $350? 22 words is hardly copyright infringement. In fact, this seems like a clear example of fair use. Rather, I think the guy simply got screwed by Warner and their legion of form licensing people. Scare tactics often work. It's still a shame though.
Permalink to Comment2. Lemi4 on November 24, 2004 12:10 AM writes...
Has anybody emailed this to Radiohead yet?
Permalink to Comment