Corante

AUTHORS

Donna Wentworth
( Archive | Home | Technorati Profile)

Ernest Miller
( Archive | Home )

Elizabeth Rader
( Archive | Home )

Jason Schultz
( Archive | Home )

Wendy Seltzer
( Archive | Home | Technorati Profile )

Aaron Swartz
( Archive | Home )

Alan Wexelblat
( Archive | Home )

About this weblog
Here we'll explore the nexus of legal rulings, Capitol Hill policy-making, technical standards development, and technological innovation that creates -- and will recreate -- the networked world as we know it. Among the topics we'll touch on: intellectual property conflicts, technical architecture and innovation, the evolution of copyright, private vs. public interests in Net policy-making, lobbying and the law, and more.

Disclaimer: the opinions expressed in this weblog are those of the authors and not of their respective institutions.

What Does "Copyfight" Mean?

Copyfight, the Solo Years: April 2002-March 2004

COPYFIGHTERS
a Typical Joe
Academic Copyright
Jack Balkin
John Perry Barlow
Benlog
beSpacific
bIPlog
Blogaritaville
Blogbook IP
BoingBoing
David Bollier
James Boyle
Robert Boynton
Brad Ideas
Ren Bucholz
Cabalamat: Digital Rights
Cinema Minima
CoCo
Commons-blog
Consensus @ Lawyerpoint
Copyfighter's Musings
Copyfutures
Copyright Readings
Copyrighteous
CopyrightWatch Canada
Susan Crawford
Walt Crawford
Creative Commons
Cruelty to Analog
Culture Cat
Deep Links
Derivative Work
Detritus
Julian Dibbell
DigitalConsumer
Digital Copyright Canada
Displacement of Concepts
Downhill Battle
DTM:<|
Electrolite
Exploded Library
Bret Fausett
Edward Felten - Freedom to Tinker
Edward Felten - Dashlog
Frank Field
Seth Finkelstein
Brian Flemming
Frankston, Reed
Free Culture
Free Range Librarian
Michael Froomkin
Michael Geist
Michael Geist's BNA News
Dan Gillmor
Mike Godwin
Joe Gratz
GrepLaw
James Grimmelmann
GrokLaw
Groklaw News
Matt Haughey
Erik J. Heels
ICANNWatch.org
Illegal-art.org
Induce Act blog
Inter Alia
IP & Social Justice
IPac blog
IPTAblog
Joi Ito
Jon Johansen
JD Lasica
LawMeme.org
Legal Theory Blog
Lenz Blog
Larry Lessig
Jessica Litman
James Love
Alex Macgillivray
Madisonian Theory
Maison Bisson
Kevin Marks
Tim Marman
Matt Rolls a Hoover
miniLinks
Mary Minow
Declan McCullagh
Eben Moglen
Dan Moniz
Napsterization
Nerdlaw
NQB
Danny O'Brien
Open Access
Open Codex
John Palfrey
Chris Palmer
Promote the Progress
PK News
PVR Blog
Eric Raymond
Joseph Reagle
Recording Industry vs. the People
Lisa Rein
Thomas Roessler
Seth Schoen
Doc Searls
Seb's Open Research
Shifted Librarian
Doug Simpson
Slapnose
Slashdot.org
Stay Free! Daily
Sarah Stirland
Swarthmore Coalition
Tech Law Advisor
Technology Liberation Front
Teleread
Siva Vaidhyanathan
Vertical Hold
Kim Weatherall
Weblogg-ed
David Weinberger
Matthew Yglesias

LINKABLE + THINKABLE
AKMA
Timothy Armstrong
Bag and Baggage
Charles Bailey
Beltway Blogroll
Between Lawyers
Blawg Channel
bk
Chief Blogging Officer
Drew Clark
Chris Cohen
Crawlspace
Crooked Timber
Daily Whirl
Dead Parrots Society
Delaware Law Office
J. Bradford DeLong
Betsy Devine
Dispositive
Ben Edelman
EEJD
Ernie the Attorney
FedLawyerGuy
Foreword
How Appealing
Industry Standard
IP Democracy
IPnewsblog
IP Watch
Dennis Kennedy
Rick Klau
Wendy Koslow
Kuro5hin.org
Elizabeth L. Lawley
Jerry Lawson
Legal Reader
Likelihood of Confusion
Chris Locke
Derek Lowe
Misbehaving
MIT Tech Review
NewsGrist
OtherMag
Paper Chase
Frank Paynter
PHOSITA
Scott Rosenberg
Scrivener's Error
Jeneane Sessum
Silent Lucidity
Smart Mobs
Trademark Blog
Eugene Volokh
Kevin Werbach

ORGANIZATIONS
ARL
Berkman @ Harvard
CDT
Chilling Effects
CIS @ Stanford
CPSR
Copyright Reform
Creative Commons
DigitalConsumer.org
DFC
EFF
EPIC
FIPR
FCC
FEPP
FSF
Global Internet Proj.
ICANN
IETF
ILPF
Info Commons
IP Justice
ISP @ Yale
NY for Fair Use
Open Content
PFF
Public Knowledge
Shidler Center @ UW
Tech Center @ GMU
U. Maine Tech Law Center
US Copyright Office
US Dept. of Justice
US Patent Office
W3C


In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

Copyfight

« NYPL Digital | Main | Apple v. Bloggers - No Ruling Yet »

March 4, 2005

Thinking through the numbers

Email This Entry

Posted by Alan Wexelblat

Buried inside a mostly incoherent story, Sean Daly reports for the Washington Post the to-me startling fact that CD sales in 2004 increased. Climbed 2.3% after four years of steady sales declines.

I can't come up with a coherent explanation of this. On one side we no doubt have the Cartel crowing victory in their jihad against their customers. Presumably more people have been scared into buying CDs? I find this hard to believe, given that all the ratings metrics I could find indicate that downloading via P2P nets is at an all-time high.

On the other side, Copyfighters including myself have claimed that CD sales were falling because the product sucks and is too expensive. That didn't change in 04, so far as I can tell. Retail prices held pretty steady and the vast majority of Cartel output is mega-hit-oriented paptastic products just like the four years preceding (or more like the 14 or 24 years preceding, but I digress). Can a few mega-hits such as Usher's 9-million selling Confessions really lift an entire nation's sales numbers?

If both sides' main arguments are wrong, to what can we attribute the rise? One thought is that it's a general economic trend. People and the economy were generally better off in 04 and perhaps more dollars in peoples' pockets translated into more entertainment spending? But if that's true, why have people shifted their dollars back into CDs when in the preceding years they were spending their entertainment dollars on games, DVDs and movies, all of which were enjoying robust growth as CD album sales slid down?

Baffled I am... anyone want to venture a thought?

Comments (7) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Big Thoughts


COMMENTS

1. Donna on March 4, 2005 4:58 PM writes...

How about more people listenting to and getting hooked on a wider range of music through file-sharing? After all, the file-sharing #s do continue to rise, and no one has yet proven that file-sharing harms CDs sales.

Permalink to Comment

2. BJ on March 4, 2005 5:35 PM writes...

You don't think it's because the economy was slightly stronger and people had more money to spend on entertainment?

Permalink to Comment

3. odograph on March 4, 2005 5:38 PM writes...

Based on what I heard from friends, I'd thought that media purchases had shifted from music to DVDs for a while. Now maybe DVDs are a little bit old and iTunes is driving a return to music?

That's my guess, more of a cultural trend.

Permalink to Comment

4. Chris Brand on March 4, 2005 7:06 PM writes...

I suspect that p2p has the same effect that the radio does - people hear music they like through it and go out to buy the CD.

Remember that broadcast radio was going to be the death of the music industry too.

Permalink to Comment

5. odograph on March 5, 2005 7:25 AM writes...

I noticed a little confirmation of my "social trend" thing this morning. Dave Winer wants $2000 more music for his iPod (link).

Maybe it is more device driven that service driven.

Permalink to Comment

6. Rafael Venegas on March 5, 2005 9:47 PM writes...

Based on the sales of records, royalties may need to be paid to artists and the owners of the songs (mostly publishers that have acquired the songs in exchange for nothing). As a result of, in my opinion and experience, scams and useless record sales audits. I am a theoretical recipient of royalties from about 100 currently sold recordings from about 40 record companies, none of which has ever paid any royalty. In this atmosphere many sales figures are simply made up so as to mimnimize royalty payments.

A related problem is that music publishers that control many of the songs the songs cannot protest because about the record sales figures necause thae have their own skeletons in their closet and the record makers exploit this.

Certaily the IRS does not audit record makers sales books to determine if royalty payments were made.

Surelt record dales figures are mostly cooked up and unanalyzable. The sales published figure for bootleg records may actually be more reliable because royalties are not paid for these records.

Permalink to Comment

7. Barry Ritholtz on March 6, 2005 8:01 PM writes...

This is old news; While any sales increase was a welcome change by the industry, the final number was ultimately a dissapointment -- The first half of 2004 saw album sales up 8% gains from the prior year, so a 2.4% increase for the year means 2H sales crashed . . .

The WSJ noted that "Music companies have tried to capitalize on the DVD boom, although for the moment, they can't keep pace with movie and television-program sales. Not one of the top 40-selling DVD titles, according to Nielsen VideoScan, is a music title."

Once again, we see a floundering industry unable to make positive moves in the right direction. Oh well, perhaps the bleeding has stopped.

Permalink to Comment


EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
Everything You Need to Know About Doing a Kickstarter
Is Patent Valuation a Leading Indicator of Trolls' Demise?
Free Music in a Capitalist Society
Art & Law in Chicago
Compare and Contrast Approaches to the DMCA
CBS to HBO: Wait for Us!
Sometime Next Year, HBO Will Become Netflix
OpenMedia vs the TPP