« What Happens When You Have a WIPO Meeting... |
Main
| How to Save the Orphans »
March 8, 2005
Are Fox News Reporters "Journalists"?
Posted by
Ronald Coleman of Likelihood of Confusion, responding below to Jack Balkin's argument that courts should determine whether a blogger is a journalist by examining what he or she actually does: "Yeah but. Does that mean that when an established media outlet ('MSM') runs a story that demonstrates a *failure* to do these things in connection with news reporting, that that publication or program will lose its presumptive entitlement to 'journalist' status? In other words, does bunking down with the Mujaheeden innoculate you for life from shoddy journalistic practices?"
Comments (4)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Speech
- RELATED ENTRIES
- › Oh and by the Way
- › Tor Sees No Increase In Illegal Copies After One Year DRM-Free
- › Free Publication on "Seismic Shift" in CA Copyright Law
- › EFF Challenges Bad Patent Filings - But There's a Bigger Issue
- › Video Game Development Game Ironic Piracy
- › British Photo Copyright Orphans' Concern
- › Mike Masnick Curb-Stomps Jaron Lanier
- › Microsoft Appears Ready to Relent on Xbox DRM
1. Ronald Coleman on March 8, 2005 2:43 PM writes...
Thanks for the link, Donna, but really! The "Mujaheeden" reference should have been a tipoff that I meant Gunga Dan ("fake but accurate"). But fair is fair -- the question applies regardless of the institution, right, left or center.
We're on a damned splippery slope to government licensure of the press here.
Permalink to Comment2. Erick Burtness on March 8, 2005 4:07 PM writes...
Or CBS News "reporters", for that matter...
Also, while one could potentially argue that MSN (or at least MSNBC) is an established media outlet, I think he actually used "MSM" (Mainstream Media), not "MSN".
Permalink to Comment3. Ronald Coleman on March 8, 2005 4:34 PM writes...
Yeah, I meant "MSM."
Permalink to Comment4. Donna on March 8, 2005 5:41 PM writes...
Thanks, guys -- fixed.
Permalink to Comment