About this weblog
Here we'll explore the nexus of legal rulings, Capitol Hill
policy-making, technical standards development, and technological
innovation that creates -- and will recreate -- the networked world as we
know it. Among the topics we'll touch on: intellectual property
conflicts, technical architecture and innovation, the evolution of
copyright, private vs. public interests in Net policy-making, lobbying
and the law, and more.
Disclaimer: the opinions expressed in this weblog are those of the authors and not of their respective institutions.
What Does "Copyfight" Mean?
Copyfight, the Solo Years: April 2002-March 2004
1. Rik on April 25, 2005 11:16 AM writes...
I have not yet been able to find the decision. The not-working link you provide probably refers to the French 01.net article, of which you can find a translation here.
Permalink to CommentI give some additional background at my blog.
2. Dr. wex on April 26, 2005 1:19 PM writes...
Reg coverage: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/04/26/french_drm_non/
Permalink to Commentreferences Afterdawn story (http://www.afterdawn.com/news/archive/6363.cfm) which has links at the bottom to 01Net story (http://www.01net.com/editorial/274752/droit/la-justice-interdit-de-proteger-les-dvd-contre-la-copie/) in French and finally a link to a translation done at Peer Pressure blog (http://www.allpeers.com/blog/?page_id=113).
3. Seth Finkelstein on April 26, 2005 4:23 PM writes...
That's all echoes, or echoes of echoes.
Be very ways of repetution of the same source being taken as independent confirmation.
Permalink to Comment