« A Patent System Gone Awry |
Main
| Evolution of iTunes »
May 10, 2005
Online Journalism Investigating Itself
Posted by Alan Wexelblat
According to an AP story (here on USA Today), an investigation by Adam Penenberg into articles written by WIRED contributor Michelle Delio has turned up more than 40 "color quote" sources who could not be identified. Alert readers may recognize Penenberg as the person who exposed fabricated stories by Stephen Glass in The New Republic.
Delio has pointed out in her own defense that these quote sources were supporting main news points in the stories, which she says have not been questioned.
However, WIRED, in its lengthy report on the matter, noted four stories in which "unconfirmed sources arguably play a more prominent role," and has edited these stories to reflect its findings but left the stories online. Other publications have taken more conservative views: MIT's Tech Review pulled two of Delio's stories, and Infoworld edited stories to remove non-sourceable quotes.
The question here is did Delio make up the quotes or simply fail to keep adequate notes on the contact information for these sources? As someone who is himself habitually disorganized, I have some sympathy for a person who didn't keep notes on things she considered minor that happened some years ago. Given the general air of hostility towards online journalim, it'll be interesting to see how it responds to scandals in the family.
Comments (5)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: Speech
- RELATED ENTRIES
- Apple Jumps Into iBooks - With Hobnailed Boots
- On the Dissent in Golan v Holder
- Jonathan Coulton on Megaupload/Piracy
- Stallman on E-Book Evils & Privacy
- Admin Update
- Joe Konrath Claims USD 100,000 E-book Profits in Jan
- Nate Anderson vs the MPAA
- SF vs SF Ideas
1. david goldenberg on May 10, 2005 9:03 PM writes...
Here's a recent interview I did with Adam Penenberg, who is in charge of the Delio investigation:
Permalink to Commenthttp://www.gelfmagazine.com/mt/archives/interview_with_adam_penenberg.html
2. Binnsy on May 12, 2005 1:32 AM writes...
My two bobs' worth on the Delio affair can be found in the latter half of this post:
Permalink to Commenthttp://binnsyshovel.blogspot.com/2005/05/rotting-dragon-leaves-no-clue-as-to.html
I just think the fact that Delio's written 700 articles for Wired, about 95% of which were decently written and sourced, is being overlooked here. There are much more corrupt journalists in the world than this one.
3. mph on May 12, 2005 2:55 AM writes...
I just think the fact that Delio's written 700 articles for Wired, about 95% of which were decently written and sourced, is being overlooked here.
That "fact" isn't being overlooked because it's not true anyhow. Less than a quarter of her entire body of work for Wired News has been investigated.
Permalink to Comment4. Binnsy on May 12, 2005 3:50 AM writes...
Okay, the mainstream media hard at work deceiving again - From the obviously too few articles I read on the subject, the fact that only a portion of her work was under scrutiny was omitted. I assumed, probably too hastily, that all Delio's work had been investigated.
I apologise for my being misleading. My research usually covers more bases than the MSM, but the lack of bloggers blogging on the Delio case at the time of writing prohibited me from doing so. This dilemma will be rectified in tomorrow's post on my blog. Thanks for the heads-up.
Permalink to Comment5. Tom Gwynn on May 19, 2005 1:56 PM writes...
"My research usually covers more bases than the MSM, but the lack of bloggers blogging on the Delio case at the time of writing prohibited me from doing so."
In other words, other people weren't doing your legwork for you.
Man, is that pathetic. And bloggers wonder by the media doesn't take them seriously.
Permalink to Comment