About this weblog
Here we'll explore the nexus of legal rulings, Capitol Hill
policy-making, technical standards development, and technological
innovation that creates -- and will recreate -- the networked world as we
know it. Among the topics we'll touch on: intellectual property
conflicts, technical architecture and innovation, the evolution of
copyright, private vs. public interests in Net policy-making, lobbying
and the law, and more.
Disclaimer: the opinions expressed in this weblog are those of the authors and not of their respective institutions.
What Does "Copyfight" Mean?
Copyfight, the Solo Years: April 2002-March 2004
1. Maciek on June 17, 2005 11:49 AM writes...
He probably talks about me, because I want IP laws to be abolished. But I don't think he had to chance to learn about my views regarding IP. It's nice to be considered radical...
Permalink to Comment2. Branko Collin on June 17, 2005 4:31 PM writes...
All "intellectual property", for whatever meaning Glickman ascribes to it, is commonly owned. Publishers, pardon: artists, only have works on loan from the public.
It is amazing to see how somebody with so much disregard for the law as Glickman gets away with it. Do we really want to live in a world where people like Glickmann so openly get to advocate stealing our cultural heritage?
Permalink to Comment