Corante

AUTHORS

Donna Wentworth
( Archive | Home | Technorati Profile)

Ernest Miller
( Archive | Home )

Elizabeth Rader
( Archive | Home )

Jason Schultz
( Archive | Home )

Wendy Seltzer
( Archive | Home | Technorati Profile )

Aaron Swartz
( Archive | Home )

Alan Wexelblat
( Archive | Home )

About this weblog
Here we'll explore the nexus of legal rulings, Capitol Hill policy-making, technical standards development, and technological innovation that creates -- and will recreate -- the networked world as we know it. Among the topics we'll touch on: intellectual property conflicts, technical architecture and innovation, the evolution of copyright, private vs. public interests in Net policy-making, lobbying and the law, and more.

Disclaimer: the opinions expressed in this weblog are those of the authors and not of their respective institutions.

What Does "Copyfight" Mean?

Copyfight, the Solo Years: April 2002-March 2004

COPYFIGHTERS
a Typical Joe
Academic Copyright
Jack Balkin
John Perry Barlow
Benlog
beSpacific
bIPlog
Blogaritaville
Blogbook IP
BoingBoing
David Bollier
James Boyle
Robert Boynton
Brad Ideas
Ren Bucholz
Cabalamat: Digital Rights
Cinema Minima
CoCo
Commons-blog
Consensus @ Lawyerpoint
Copyfighter's Musings
Copyfutures
Copyright Readings
Copyrighteous
CopyrightWatch Canada
Susan Crawford
Walt Crawford
Creative Commons
Cruelty to Analog
Culture Cat
Deep Links
Derivative Work
Detritus
Julian Dibbell
DigitalConsumer
Digital Copyright Canada
Displacement of Concepts
Downhill Battle
DTM:<|
Electrolite
Exploded Library
Bret Fausett
Edward Felten - Freedom to Tinker
Edward Felten - Dashlog
Frank Field
Seth Finkelstein
Brian Flemming
Frankston, Reed
Free Culture
Free Range Librarian
Michael Froomkin
Michael Geist
Michael Geist's BNA News
Dan Gillmor
Mike Godwin
Joe Gratz
GrepLaw
James Grimmelmann
GrokLaw
Groklaw News
Matt Haughey
Erik J. Heels
ICANNWatch.org
Illegal-art.org
Induce Act blog
Inter Alia
IP & Social Justice
IPac blog
IPTAblog
Joi Ito
Jon Johansen
JD Lasica
LawMeme.org
Legal Theory Blog
Lenz Blog
Larry Lessig
Jessica Litman
James Love
Alex Macgillivray
Madisonian Theory
Maison Bisson
Kevin Marks
Tim Marman
Matt Rolls a Hoover
miniLinks
Mary Minow
Declan McCullagh
Eben Moglen
Dan Moniz
Napsterization
Nerdlaw
NQB
Danny O'Brien
Open Access
Open Codex
John Palfrey
Chris Palmer
Promote the Progress
PK News
PVR Blog
Eric Raymond
Joseph Reagle
Recording Industry vs. the People
Lisa Rein
Thomas Roessler
Seth Schoen
Doc Searls
Seb's Open Research
Shifted Librarian
Doug Simpson
Slapnose
Slashdot.org
Stay Free! Daily
Sarah Stirland
Swarthmore Coalition
Tech Law Advisor
Technology Liberation Front
Teleread
Siva Vaidhyanathan
Vertical Hold
Kim Weatherall
Weblogg-ed
David Weinberger
Matthew Yglesias

LINKABLE + THINKABLE
AKMA
Timothy Armstrong
Bag and Baggage
Charles Bailey
Beltway Blogroll
Between Lawyers
Blawg Channel
bk
Chief Blogging Officer
Drew Clark
Chris Cohen
Crawlspace
Crooked Timber
Daily Whirl
Dead Parrots Society
Delaware Law Office
J. Bradford DeLong
Betsy Devine
Dispositive
Ben Edelman
EEJD
Ernie the Attorney
FedLawyerGuy
Foreword
How Appealing
Industry Standard
IP Democracy
IPnewsblog
IP Watch
Dennis Kennedy
Rick Klau
Wendy Koslow
Kuro5hin.org
Elizabeth L. Lawley
Jerry Lawson
Legal Reader
Likelihood of Confusion
Chris Locke
Derek Lowe
Misbehaving
MIT Tech Review
NewsGrist
OtherMag
Paper Chase
Frank Paynter
PHOSITA
Scott Rosenberg
Scrivener's Error
Jeneane Sessum
Silent Lucidity
Smart Mobs
Trademark Blog
Eugene Volokh
Kevin Werbach

ORGANIZATIONS
ARL
Berkman @ Harvard
CDT
Chilling Effects
CIS @ Stanford
CPSR
Copyright Reform
Creative Commons
DigitalConsumer.org
DFC
EFF
EPIC
FIPR
FCC
FEPP
FSF
Global Internet Proj.
ICANN
IETF
ILPF
Info Commons
IP Justice
ISP @ Yale
NY for Fair Use
Open Content
PFF
Public Knowledge
Shidler Center @ UW
Tech Center @ GMU
U. Maine Tech Law Center
US Copyright Office
US Dept. of Justice
US Patent Office
W3C


In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

Copyfight

« A Missed Opportunity | Main | Lord Save Us From Patent Reform »

August 23, 2005

When Libraries Try to Compete

Email This Entry

Posted by Alan Wexelblat

The Christian Science Monitor reports that the UTAustin library has removed 90,000 books from its undergraduate collection. In place of books, undergrads can now find couches, 250 desktop computers, and laptop bays. In an effort to be more in tune with the times (or something) the library is trying to be more Internet cafe (yes, there's going to be a cafe as well) and less dusty stacks.

The physical change, of course, is only the surface manifestation. As Donna recently commented in this blog, a battle is ongoing to preserve the essence of libraries. Part of that battle is introducing the resources and capabilities of libraries and librarians to a generation that has come of age with the 'net, sometimes with the Internet/Web as their only or primary information sources. Colleges and universities are attempting to help undergrads connect the new online sources with the traditional written sources.

Interestingly, the article notes that our current version of libraries for undergrad study is not that old. Kris Axtman's story reports that "Harvard University created the first undergraduate library in the 1950s" - this is potentially incorrect. I called Widener (Harvard's Library) and spoke with someone who was a student there in the 1970s. He indicated that he needed a letter from a professor to access the stacks as an undergrad at that time. To some degree it depends on what Axtman meant by "created" I suppose.

The nice fellow at Widener promised to research the question and email me an answer. I'll update this blog entry when he gets back to me. Hooray for librarians!

UPDATE: based on research from Widener and anonymous comment on this entry, it seems that the appropriate date is January 1949 and it was Lamont library. See Lamont Library's history page.

Comments (5) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Culture


COMMENTS

1. anon on August 23, 2005 10:49 AM writes...

"Lamont Library was the first library building of its kind within a university setting in the United States that was specifically planned for undergraduates.... The Library opened in January 1949 and was considered to be the primary support for the new curricular program for Harvard College based on the report entitled General Education in a Free Society."

http://hcl.harvard.edu/lamont/about/history.html

Permalink to Comment

2. Tobe Liebert on August 23, 2005 11:10 AM writes...

To be fair, the UGL library collection on the UT Austin campus was a fairly small collection, lightly used by students. Directly across the street from the UGL collection is the "research" library on campus (the Perry Castenada Library), housing one of the biggest print collections in the nation. The UGL facility has been increasingly used as a computer-centered facility for some time now, and this recent move just completes the process.

Permalink to Comment

3. Dr. wex on August 23, 2005 11:18 AM writes...

Interesting. So 1949, and Lamont not Widener. So what to make of the fellow who remembers needing a professor's letter? Thank you anon, whoever you are.

Permalink to Comment

4. JMG on August 23, 2005 11:49 AM writes...

Harvard has many libraries. Widener is the main one, with the most books and the most daunting stacks. Lamont and Cabot (the science library) are still the two most often used by undergraduates, as well as the many specialty libraries (essentially every department has its own). When I was an undergrad, Lamont had an exhibit on the debate about whether to allow Radcliffe undergrads to use Lamont as well. The articles from that era were hilariously and quaintly misogynistic.

Generally, the undergrads don't venture into the stacks of Widener unless they're doing some pretty obscure research, or, for the more daring, if they're looking for a dark corner in which to get frisky. (I'm not kidding.)

Permalink to Comment

5. Carlos Ovalle on August 23, 2005 12:26 PM writes...

Wanted to point out the the books are still around, but moved to other collections, as the article notes.

The proposed changes to the UGL have been interesting, and appear to be the result of several issues, some covered in the article and some not covered in the article. For example, most of these articles don't mention the budgets of the entities involved as part of this change, but that's certainly an issue.

Older info here:

University Libraries' Press Release:
http://www.lib.utexas.edu/about/news/fac.html

UT Press Release:
http://www.utexas.edu/opa/ic/oncampus/2005/may/tower.html

Daily Texan:
http://www.dailytexanonline.com/media/paper410/news/2005/04/25/TopStories/Ugl-To.Be.Converted.To.Information.Center-935848.shtml

Daily Texan:
http://www.dailytexanonline.com/media/paper410/news/2005/06/06/University/Ugl-Undergoes.First.Leg.Of.Digital.Makeover-955723.shtml

Daily Texan:
http://www.dailytexanonline.com/media/paper410/news/2005/06/08/University/Entrance.To.Ugl.Will.Not.Require.Ut.Ids-956224.shtml

The School of Information, where I work and teach on occasion, is going to be part of this new "information commons." Note that the School of Information used to be the School of Library and Information Science. ^_^

At any rate, we're eager to see what this new space will look like and how it will be used, and what the criteria will be for successful use... and of course, if we're actually moving in. :P

Permalink to Comment


EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
Music Business for 21st Century Independent Artists
Net Neutrality? Still Could Be Kept
Hey, Look, E-Books Still Suck
Makers, Fan Art, Making it Pay
IP Analogy to Physical Property (in Architecture)
That Sound You Hear is the Anti-Neutrality Dam Breaking
Having (Mostly) Failed with Authors, Amazon Makes a Pitch for the Readers
And No Kill Switches, Either