Donna Wentworth
( Archive | Home | Technorati Profile)

Ernest Miller
( Archive | Home )

Elizabeth Rader
( Archive | Home )

Jason Schultz
( Archive | Home )

Wendy Seltzer
( Archive | Home | Technorati Profile )

Aaron Swartz
( Archive | Home )

Alan Wexelblat
( Archive | Home )

About this weblog
Here we'll explore the nexus of legal rulings, Capitol Hill policy-making, technical standards development, and technological innovation that creates -- and will recreate -- the networked world as we know it. Among the topics we'll touch on: intellectual property conflicts, technical architecture and innovation, the evolution of copyright, private vs. public interests in Net policy-making, lobbying and the law, and more.

Disclaimer: the opinions expressed in this weblog are those of the authors and not of their respective institutions.

What Does "Copyfight" Mean?

Copyfight, the Solo Years: April 2002-March 2004

a Typical Joe
Academic Copyright
Jack Balkin
John Perry Barlow
Blogbook IP
David Bollier
James Boyle
Robert Boynton
Brad Ideas
Ren Bucholz
Cabalamat: Digital Rights
Cinema Minima
Consensus @ Lawyerpoint
Copyfighter's Musings
Copyright Readings
CopyrightWatch Canada
Susan Crawford
Walt Crawford
Creative Commons
Cruelty to Analog
Culture Cat
Deep Links
Derivative Work
Julian Dibbell
Digital Copyright Canada
Displacement of Concepts
Downhill Battle
Exploded Library
Bret Fausett
Edward Felten - Freedom to Tinker
Edward Felten - Dashlog
Frank Field
Seth Finkelstein
Brian Flemming
Frankston, Reed
Free Culture
Free Range Librarian
Michael Froomkin
Michael Geist
Michael Geist's BNA News
Dan Gillmor
Mike Godwin
Joe Gratz
James Grimmelmann
Groklaw News
Matt Haughey
Erik J. Heels
Induce Act blog
Inter Alia
IP & Social Justice
IPac blog
Joi Ito
Jon Johansen
JD Lasica
Legal Theory Blog
Lenz Blog
Larry Lessig
Jessica Litman
James Love
Alex Macgillivray
Madisonian Theory
Maison Bisson
Kevin Marks
Tim Marman
Matt Rolls a Hoover
Mary Minow
Declan McCullagh
Eben Moglen
Dan Moniz
Danny O'Brien
Open Access
Open Codex
John Palfrey
Chris Palmer
Promote the Progress
PK News
PVR Blog
Eric Raymond
Joseph Reagle
Recording Industry vs. the People
Lisa Rein
Thomas Roessler
Seth Schoen
Doc Searls
Seb's Open Research
Shifted Librarian
Doug Simpson
Stay Free! Daily
Sarah Stirland
Swarthmore Coalition
Tech Law Advisor
Technology Liberation Front
Siva Vaidhyanathan
Vertical Hold
Kim Weatherall
David Weinberger
Matthew Yglesias

Timothy Armstrong
Bag and Baggage
Charles Bailey
Beltway Blogroll
Between Lawyers
Blawg Channel
Chief Blogging Officer
Drew Clark
Chris Cohen
Crooked Timber
Daily Whirl
Dead Parrots Society
Delaware Law Office
J. Bradford DeLong
Betsy Devine
Ben Edelman
Ernie the Attorney
How Appealing
Industry Standard
IP Democracy
IP Watch
Dennis Kennedy
Rick Klau
Wendy Koslow
Elizabeth L. Lawley
Jerry Lawson
Legal Reader
Likelihood of Confusion
Chris Locke
Derek Lowe
MIT Tech Review
Paper Chase
Frank Paynter
Scott Rosenberg
Scrivener's Error
Jeneane Sessum
Silent Lucidity
Smart Mobs
Trademark Blog
Eugene Volokh
Kevin Werbach

Berkman @ Harvard
Chilling Effects
CIS @ Stanford
Copyright Reform
Creative Commons
Global Internet Proj.
Info Commons
IP Justice
ISP @ Yale
NY for Fair Use
Open Content
Public Knowledge
Shidler Center @ UW
Tech Center @ GMU
U. Maine Tech Law Center
US Copyright Office
US Dept. of Justice
US Patent Office

In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline


« Rip, Mix, Share (TV) | Main | Blog Vacation »

September 9, 2005

RIAA to Congress: Give Us Control of Digital Radio

Email This Entry

Posted by

Mike Godwin has the scoop on the recording industry's new bid to assert control over radio broadcasts, in an effort to stop you from doing things like "[automatically copying] particular recordings of the user's choice, thereby transforming a passive listening experience into a personal music library often without even listening to the original broadcast."

In other words, it's worried that you'll have a TiVo for radio. And it believes that by citing fears of digital "theft" of free radio broadcasts -- which have never copy-protected -- it can persuade Congress to stop TiVo for radio from happening. Or, to be more precise, to stop it from happening without being able to control it. It's already decided, for example, that people shouldn't be able to automatically search for and record songs by a particular artist. But after the Broadcast Flag smackdown, it needs Congress to give the FCC explicit authority to make it so.

Writes Fred von Lohmann @ Deep Links:

[The] music industry is basically saying that, where recording from next-generation radio is concerned, government must step in and freeze innovation to ensure that you can never do anything that you couldn't do with an analog cassette deck in 1984. This, despite the fact that Congress specifically approved of digital recording off the radio in the Audio Home Recording Act in 1992. So this is about stopping music fans from doing things that are perfectly legal under copyright law.

For more on why a Broadcast Flag-style regime for digital radio is a bad idea, check out Public Knowledge President Gigi Sohn's opinion piece from last spring, Say No to a Radio Broadcast Flag.

Comments (1) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Laws and Regulations


1. Scott on June 29, 2009 7:57 AM writes...

WTF??? So are we on the verge of becoming Radio Free America? visions of Red Dawn. IF the act of 1992 made it legal to copy for archival purposes or for personal use.. And Especially in these times when income is low and unemployment is high.. the only ones who have money are corporate america. We the people need to join some how and eliminate the RIAA.. maybe if people stop buying their product it will make them reconsider.. I am sure that most people have an abundance of music libraries? Since the Congress is subscribing to this fallacy, it really is against their own interests, how is anyone going to know what they like if music is removed from the airwaves? Don't tell me another story about DIGITAL RADIO transmission.. I don't believe it for an instant.. Digital TV has already hurt the viewers because those of us who can't afford 60.00/month to watch Cable or Satellite TV and have to rely on either radio or unreliable TV will surely fall into the woodwork and may become the protectors of the Americas.. I call for a boycott on RIAA, an impeachment of all congress, and ALL state representatives that support this and I also call on a resignation of any state representative who supports TAXING what once was free (YES this includes the FCC for taxing TV service, Rendell for wanting to TAX Radio.. I say it is time for EACH and EVERY resident and Each and EVERY member of Congress, and EACH and EVERY member of the Government to Honor the oaths that they took to protect this country against themselves or to resign your posts.. the US was fine before the taxation of out government to support a war that once over should have eliminated the taxes.. The Copngress should NOT be able to retire, they should all lose their pensions as I will lose MY pension thanks to piss poor government mismanagement. If Mr Obama continues to erode our resources then he also should stepdown eith his entire administration.. IMHO The Congress as well as the President should live no better than the least of their citizens,, 250,000/yr? the president has his food and shelter supplied by the US Citizens, Mr Obama, Congress,, I charge you to try to live as an unemployed person for a year (with NO unemployment benefits).. I am unemployed, I quit a dangerous job because I was injured twice almost 3 times, and since I quit to protect my personal health My unemployment benefits were denied, EVEN after I made the point know that the job is dangerous and that I was practically killed and WAS injured (through no fault of my own) twice in less than a year.. I can't even afford to wash clothes therefore how the Hell am I supposed to even try to get a job in this post Bush USofA?

Permalink to Comment


Remember Me?


Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):

If It's Not One Clause It's Another
At the End of this Hypothetical Day I Might Be Destroyed
Belgian Court Acquits Pirate Bay Founders
Sometimes Saying Nothing is Saying Something
Europeans Make Really Stupid Copyright Decisions, Too
Dogs Now Fight in Slightly Cleaner Pit (Thanks, Amazon)
Future of Music Summit 2015 this October
Licensing Doesn't Outlive Patents