Here we'll explore the nexus of legal rulings, Capitol Hill
policy-making, technical standards development, and technological
innovation that creates -- and will recreate -- the networked world as we
know it. Among the topics we'll touch on: intellectual property
conflicts, technical architecture and innovation, the evolution of
copyright, private vs. public interests in Net policy-making, lobbying
and the law, and more.
Disclaimer: the opinions expressed in this weblog are those of the authors and not of their respective institutions.
Edward Felten, proposing a "Pizzaright Principle" litmus test for determining whether or not expansionist proposals to create new intellectual property rights make sense:
Lately, lots of bogus arguments for copyright expansion have been floating around. A handy detector for bogus arguments is the Pizzaright Principle.
[...]
Suppose that Bob argues that the profitability of broadcasting may be about to decrease, so broadcasters should be given new intellectual property rights. He could equally well argue that if the pizza business has become less profitable, a pizzaright should be created.
(The flaw in Bob's argument was the failure to show that the new right furthers the interests of society as a whole, as opposed to the narrow interests of the broadcasters or pizzamakers.)
Catchy, but unhelpful. If pizzas were becoming less profitable because of rampant pizza theft, I think it would be reasonable for a legislature or regulator to take some sort of action for the protection of pizzas and pizza revenue streams.
1. Bruce on September 28, 2005 3:49 PM writes...
Catchy, but unhelpful. If pizzas were becoming less profitable because of rampant pizza theft, I think it would be reasonable for a legislature or regulator to take some sort of action for the protection of pizzas and pizza revenue streams.
Permalink to Comment