Here we'll explore the nexus of legal rulings, Capitol Hill
policy-making, technical standards development, and technological
innovation that creates -- and will recreate -- the networked world as we
know it. Among the topics we'll touch on: intellectual property
conflicts, technical architecture and innovation, the evolution of
copyright, private vs. public interests in Net policy-making, lobbying
and the law, and more.
Disclaimer: the opinions expressed in this weblog are those of the authors and not of their respective institutions.
Apple Trying to Patent "Tamper-Resistant" Software
Posted by Alan Wexelblat
Ina Fried has a story on news.com about the just-published Apple patent application. The idea seems to be that code would be limited to specific hardware and in theory could get around various simulators and virtualization technologies. I find this hard to believe, but perhaps that's why it's "resistant" rather than "proof." According to Fried's story, the OS itself would be obfuscated in such a way as to make it difficult to detect what MAC or ROM code was being read to validate the hardware platform. I haven't looked at the patent application yet, so I've no idea what prior art is cited. My guess is that there's a ton and the patent has little or none of it. Geeks who attack this technology as breakable (which it most certainly will be) are missing the point. This is further evidence that whatever Jobs says in public, Apple is kissing ass hard with the Cartel. Apple want to convince the Cartel that digital content will be locked up tight, using a combination of Intel's hardware and Apple's OS use of it.
The assumption that Apple is giving into the Cartel with this just rings untrue. Apple's only way to be different once it goes over to Intel will be its operating system. Without that they just make neato machines (see Alienware). Any measure by them to figure out how to make it so that their OS only runs on machines they built is in their best interest because without their computer building days are numbered.
1. Pinski on November 10, 2005 12:36 PM writes...
The assumption that Apple is giving into the Cartel with this just rings untrue. Apple's only way to be different once it goes over to Intel will be its operating system. Without that they just make neato machines (see Alienware). Any measure by them to figure out how to make it so that their OS only runs on machines they built is in their best interest because without their computer building days are numbered.
Permalink to Comment