About this weblog
Here we'll explore the nexus of legal rulings, Capitol Hill
policy-making, technical standards development, and technological
innovation that creates -- and will recreate -- the networked world as we
know it. Among the topics we'll touch on: intellectual property
conflicts, technical architecture and innovation, the evolution of
copyright, private vs. public interests in Net policy-making, lobbying
and the law, and more.
Disclaimer: the opinions expressed in this weblog are those of the authors and not of their respective institutions.
What Does "Copyfight" Mean?
Copyfight, the Solo Years: April 2002-March 2004
1. Neo on May 19, 2006 10:40 PM writes...
Re: previous comment -- I can't understand most of this, even though it appears to be English and I read at a Kincaid grade level that's literally off the chart. I can only assume it got garbled somehow. It looks like it's a content-free "me too" type post, however. Please be more articulate in future.
And the "Remember Me?" thing still doesn't work. If you intend to support it, fix it. If you don't, remove it. Don't just leave it there deceptively claiming it will save your data when it won't.
Permalink to Comment2. drwex on May 22, 2006 9:26 AM writes...
You couldn't read it (the now-deleted comment) becaues it wasn't English - it was spammer-ese. Someone is using a comment spambot that grabs various English phrases to fool the Bayesian spam filters used by many blog sites. The key for them is embedding their commercial URL into the comment so that when Google scans the blog their URL goes into the Google database and gives them more pagerank.
I hand-delete hundreds of spam comments every week from this blog; automated tools block thousands more. But we're losing this battle.
Permalink to Comment