Here we'll explore the nexus of legal rulings, Capitol Hill
policy-making, technical standards development, and technological
innovation that creates -- and will recreate -- the networked world as we
know it. Among the topics we'll touch on: intellectual property
conflicts, technical architecture and innovation, the evolution of
copyright, private vs. public interests in Net policy-making, lobbying
and the law, and more.
Disclaimer: the opinions expressed in this weblog are those of the authors and not of their respective institutions.
PLOS, the Public Library of Science is by many measures a great success. Contrary to naysayers its online journals are well-respected and often cited (which is the real measure of currency in academic research).
Their latest announced project is PLOS One, a "forum" for publication in science and medicine. The nearest I can do to summing up the proposal is that it looks like a peer-reviewed collaboratively authored science blog. Obvious competitors are general purpose high-quality online science publications such as Scientific American, but these have heavy editorial control and limits. It will be interesting to see if the author-driven model can succeed as well as PLOS's more traditional journals have.
1. Jayel Aheram on August 21, 2006 11:00 PM writes...
I have a new word (with a definition) for you all to use if you so choose.
copyfascism - the belief in exclusive, eternal, or otherwise overly restrictive copyrights.
Permalink to Comment2. drwex on August 23, 2006 3:29 PM writes...
That's good. I'll try to remember it.
Permalink to Comment3. Dina on September 14, 2006 4:13 PM writes...
Hey Hello...
Permalink to Comment