Here we'll explore the nexus of legal rulings, Capitol Hill
policy-making, technical standards development, and technological
innovation that creates -- and will recreate -- the networked world as we
know it. Among the topics we'll touch on: intellectual property
conflicts, technical architecture and innovation, the evolution of
copyright, private vs. public interests in Net policy-making, lobbying
and the law, and more.
Disclaimer: the opinions expressed in this weblog are those of the authors and not of their respective institutions.
Never let it be said that the Cartel are stupid or don't learn. Hollywood looked at the history of CDs and first-generation DVDs and said "never again." Then they designed a system, called AACS, that would be embedded in every next-generation DVD and DVD player. The AACS requirements are strict and technical and were written by people who know a good deal about digital device architecture.
Ken Fisher has a thorough analysis of the problems that AACS DRM pose. He kicks off from Peter Gutmann's USENIX presentation, but goes much deeper. Gutman analyzed Windows Vista; Fisher contends that blaming Microsoft is beside the point. Apple will be doing precisely the same thing soon and next-generation DVDs will never play on Linux machines. Why? AACS.
The problems Fisher notes with this setup are in two categories: one is that implementing to the AACS standard consumes resources that commercial OSes should better spend elsewhere. In effect, the implementing company (whether it's Microsoft or Apple) is not free to allocate its development dollars in the way that maximizes things like OS security, customer satisfaction, or time-to-market. At least insofar as these conventional business goals conflict with the AACS requirements, good business loses.
Second, even once it's done it doesn't work. AACS is already cracked. As a secret standard developed by commercial self-interests, AACS was never subjected to the rigorous public peer review that validates important properties like integrity and trustworthiness. See Bruce Schneier's CRYPTO-GRAM list for extensive discussions of these issues. So billions of dollars are wasted on forced deployment of a broken system that benefits a tiny minority, costs the vast majority more money, and does little or nothing to stem illegal copying.
It's not clear to me is where we go from here. In under a year we'll have Macs and Vistas playing next-gen DVDs. All new movies will come out on those disks - first probably in sual issue but soon exclusively on whichever of Blu-ray or HD-DVD wins. Consumers will be forced to upgrade their players if they want to play the new disks and maybe have to re-buy their first-generation DVDs (anyone remember re-buying LPs as CDs the first time around?) But AACS will still be cracked, movies will still appear on sharing networks, and illegal players will be written for Linux and other OSes as needed. What will the Cartel's response be? I have no idea.
> All new movies will come out on those disks - first probably in sual issue but soon exclusively on whichever of Blu-ray or HD-DVD wins. Consumers will be forced to upgrade their players if they want to play the new disks and maybe have to re-buy their first-generation DVDs (anyone remember re-buying LPs as CDs the first time around?)
High Def (either format) is only a minor upgrade from DVD. Only a minority of consumers have the equipment the appreciate the difference. This isn't like the jump from LP to Cassette to CD to with corresponding jumps in quality, convenience, and portability.
Personally, as a technophile/gadget geek/nerd, I plan to continue buying DVD's for a long, long time. They do everything I want them to. And even if I do start purchsing HD discs, I see no reason to re-buy movies I already own.
This is more like the jump from CD to SACD, and I suspect the result will be the same. The future is in VOD and digital downloads.
I agree that technically there's little consumer-perceptible quality difference. But Hollywood wants to force this change and would have done it years ago if not for the idiot Bluray vs HD spat. Once that's settled they'll begin the push.
I know at least a few audiophiles who'd argue that LP->CD involved a loss of sound quality. Didn't matter - you can't get LPs for most things anymore. It's not an issue of quality though next-gen DVDs will probably be sold that way: "Better quality!" "More features!" It's about control and Hollywood seeing AACS as its best control technology to date.
1. Eric on August 15, 2007 7:10 PM writes...
> All new movies will come out on those disks - first probably in sual issue but soon exclusively on whichever of Blu-ray or HD-DVD wins. Consumers will be forced to upgrade their players if they want to play the new disks and maybe have to re-buy their first-generation DVDs (anyone remember re-buying LPs as CDs the first time around?)
High Def (either format) is only a minor upgrade from DVD. Only a minority of consumers have the equipment the appreciate the difference. This isn't like the jump from LP to Cassette to CD to with corresponding jumps in quality, convenience, and portability.
Personally, as a technophile/gadget geek/nerd, I plan to continue buying DVD's for a long, long time. They do everything I want them to. And even if I do start purchsing HD discs, I see no reason to re-buy movies I already own.
This is more like the jump from CD to SACD, and I suspect the result will be the same. The future is in VOD and digital downloads.
Permalink to Comment2. drwex on August 16, 2007 7:51 AM writes...
I agree that technically there's little consumer-perceptible quality difference. But Hollywood wants to force this change and would have done it years ago if not for the idiot Bluray vs HD spat. Once that's settled they'll begin the push.
I know at least a few audiophiles who'd argue that LP->CD involved a loss of sound quality. Didn't matter - you can't get LPs for most things anymore. It's not an issue of quality though next-gen DVDs will probably be sold that way: "Better quality!" "More features!" It's about control and Hollywood seeing AACS as its best control technology to date.
Permalink to Comment3. linki w. on September 4, 2007 5:46 PM writes...
No way to exchange movies in my collection...
Permalink to CommentI'll stay with DVDs. For better quality i used to go to cinema.