Here we'll explore the nexus of legal rulings, Capitol Hill
policy-making, technical standards development, and technological
innovation that creates -- and will recreate -- the networked world as we
know it. Among the topics we'll touch on: intellectual property
conflicts, technical architecture and innovation, the evolution of
copyright, private vs. public interests in Net policy-making, lobbying
and the law, and more.
Disclaimer: the opinions expressed in this weblog are those of the authors and not of their respective institutions.
The EU has been remarkably persistent in going after Microsoft for what the EU sees as anti-competitive and antitrust issues. Last year the EU had its earlier antitrust case upheld. According to Business Week, the first case "ended up costing Microsoft billions of dollars".
But the new case may be an even bigger deal from a business perspective. Now the EU are looking into "addresses core aspects of its business model and the preservation of its core monopolies," again quoting Business Week. The issues once again are bundling and interoperability, but this time looking at desktop and server OS. In specific, the complaint alleges that Vista and Office 2007, Microsoft is deliberately holding back information in order to hamper interoperability.
Well, um, no duh. This is what they've always done - it's just being extended to the Internet and services at this point. So far Microsoft is promising cooperation with the investigation. My guess is that they'll try to drag things out and keep it out of court for as long as possible without making any actual changes.
I am not sure I trust the EU to decide this case in favor of the consumer. There is a difference between some company imposing their government-mandated monopoly (intellectual property) on the consumer and a government attempting to force a company to do something it does not want to do.
Microsoft should not have to be coerced into tampering its products so that it becomes inter-operable with the competition's. Especially not at the behest of the government.
1. Jayel Aheram on January 18, 2008 5:26 AM writes...
I am not sure I trust the EU to decide this case in favor of the consumer. There is a difference between some company imposing their government-mandated monopoly (intellectual property) on the consumer and a government attempting to force a company to do something it does not want to do.
Microsoft should not have to be coerced into tampering its products so that it becomes inter-operable with the competition's. Especially not at the behest of the government.
Permalink to Comment