Here we'll explore the nexus of legal rulings, Capitol Hill
policy-making, technical standards development, and technological
innovation that creates -- and will recreate -- the networked world as we
know it. Among the topics we'll touch on: intellectual property
conflicts, technical architecture and innovation, the evolution of
copyright, private vs. public interests in Net policy-making, lobbying
and the law, and more.
Disclaimer: the opinions expressed in this weblog are those of the authors and not of their respective institutions.
In the Boston area?: Join us on June 11 for Startups and the Cloud, a free event on cloud computing with insights from Intuit founder Scott Cook and others
U.S. Attorney Thomas O'Brien has asked for an injunction that would seize the Mongols' trademarked name. If the order is approved, any Mongol would no longer be able to wear a jacket displaying the gang's name or emblem.
"It would allow law enforcement to seize the leather jackets right off their back," O'Brien said.
I suppose, in the sense that a trademarked logo is a tangible asset with some value, it could be seized in a law enforcement action. But, really, do you want to be the guy assigned to take a biker gang member's jacket off his back?
It's a slippery slope when law enforcement gets to dictate what a person can and can't where. I'm goingto go out on a limb and say the ACLU might have a thing or two to say about this.
It seems likely that when a person purchases a good with a licensed logo part of that purchase includes a right to use/wear the item as intended. If Nike was to be bought out tomorrow I don't think the new owners would be allowed to come confiscate my sneakers, even though they'd legally own all the trademarks and such.
1. R_Rojas on October 22, 2008 10:59 AM writes...
It's a slippery slope when law enforcement gets to dictate what a person can and can't where. I'm goingto go out on a limb and say the ACLU might have a thing or two to say about this.
Permalink to Comment2. drwex on October 23, 2008 10:33 AM writes...
It seems likely that when a person purchases a good with a licensed logo part of that purchase includes a right to use/wear the item as intended. If Nike was to be bought out tomorrow I don't think the new owners would be allowed to come confiscate my sneakers, even though they'd legally own all the trademarks and such.
Permalink to Comment