Here we'll explore the nexus of legal rulings, Capitol Hill
policy-making, technical standards development, and technological
innovation that creates -- and will recreate -- the networked world as we
know it. Among the topics we'll touch on: intellectual property
conflicts, technical architecture and innovation, the evolution of
copyright, private vs. public interests in Net policy-making, lobbying
and the law, and more.
Disclaimer: the opinions expressed in this weblog are those of the authors and not of their respective institutions.
In the Boston area?: Join us on June 11 for Startups and the Cloud, a free event on cloud computing with insights from Intuit founder Scott Cook and others
But I had not considered that the ease of finding a cheap used copy would have that big of an impact on publishing and book retailing. Used book search engines are easy to find, there's Ebay/Half.com, and even Amazon puts competing reseller links on the same pages as its new book listing. So with all that, why would anyone pay retail?
It's not too far from the question that the music business faced back at the end of the 90s when Napster boomed - given that you could get music for free, why buy? The record labels have spent most of the last decade struggling to come up with a version of what I call the "bottled water" solution - given that we have some of the world's highest quality tap water essentially for free, why do we pay so much for water in bottles? Somehow we've been convinced it's worth paying for, and there's no reason to think that consumers of music, or books, couldn't be similarly convinced.
Along the way I'd also like to be convinced of the original thesis of the column. The idea that book reselling is killing new book publishing is an interesting theory, but sadly it's put forth here without any supporting data.
1. such sweet thunder on December 31, 2008 3:54 PM writes...
I haven't been around publishing long enough to speak on this definitively but most of what I've seen makes the article appear overzealous. If the publishing industry is sinking, which I'm not sure that it is, it's certainly not just because of Ebay.
The trade industry is getting killed. But again, commodities prices were egregiously high until very recently. And I'm not certain that the trade industry is doing any worse than other semi-luxury industries. Times are great depression tough. I don't think the trade industry will look the same a year from now, but then neither will retail, or automotive, or financial, or legal . . .
Academic is still fairing reasonably well. They can somewhat skirt the issue caused by resales by producing new editions every four years. But I'm not certain if this is why they're fairing better or if it's because they have regular stream of consumers regardless of how the market is fairing.
Academic has been a monopoly business for a while, and charges at monopoly prices. It's one reason I'm a supporter of PLoS.
I take your point about recent economic troubles, but book sellers have been having difficulties for much longer than the current downturn. I don't think we can blame it just on that.
1. such sweet thunder on December 31, 2008 3:54 PM writes...
I haven't been around publishing long enough to speak on this definitively but most of what I've seen makes the article appear overzealous. If the publishing industry is sinking, which I'm not sure that it is, it's certainly not just because of Ebay.
The trade industry is getting killed. But again, commodities prices were egregiously high until very recently. And I'm not certain that the trade industry is doing any worse than other semi-luxury industries. Times are great depression tough. I don't think the trade industry will look the same a year from now, but then neither will retail, or automotive, or financial, or legal . . .
Academic is still fairing reasonably well. They can somewhat skirt the issue caused by resales by producing new editions every four years. But I'm not certain if this is why they're fairing better or if it's because they have regular stream of consumers regardless of how the market is fairing.
Permalink to Comment2. DrWex on December 31, 2008 7:54 PM writes...
Academic has been a monopoly business for a while, and charges at monopoly prices. It's one reason I'm a supporter of PLoS.
I take your point about recent economic troubles, but book sellers have been having difficulties for much longer than the current downturn. I don't think we can blame it just on that.
Permalink to Comment