« Are Resales Killing Publishing? |
Main
| Copyright Owners Contributing to the Destruction of Their Own Property »
January 2, 2009
Watchmen Judgment Posted
Posted by Alan Wexelblat
The PDF of Judge Feess' ruling on the motions for summary judgment by Fox and Warner Brothers can be found online.
I was surprised at how readable-to-a-layperson the document is. It appears that Fox's claim is nothing new, that an option for buying out Fox's rights existed for years and was never exercised, and finally contains a very interesting footnote on testimony not given and why a certain lawyer's advice may have been detrimental.
Comments (1)
+ TrackBacks (0) | Category: IP Use
POST A COMMENT
- RELATED ENTRIES
- › Oh and by the Way
- › Tor Sees No Increase In Illegal Copies After One Year DRM-Free
- › Free Publication on "Seismic Shift" in CA Copyright Law
- › EFF Challenges Bad Patent Filings - But There's a Bigger Issue
- › Video Game Development Game Ironic Piracy
- › British Photo Copyright Orphans' Concern
- › Mike Masnick Curb-Stomps Jaron Lanier
- › Microsoft Appears Ready to Relent on Xbox DRM
1. Mattie Quillens on April 6, 2012 8:03 PM writes...
I needed to write you this little note just to give many thanks once again for the superb tips you've contributed on this website. This is pretty open-handed with people like you to deliver easily exactly what numerous people would've distributed as an e-book in order to make some profit on their own, even more so seeing that you might have tried it in the event you wanted. These secrets additionally served like the fantastic way to be certain that someone else have a similar interest just like my personal own to understand lots more concerning this matter. I know there are some more pleasurable periods up front for many who check out your website.
Permalink to Comment