Here we'll explore the nexus of legal rulings, Capitol Hill
policy-making, technical standards development, and technological
innovation that creates -- and will recreate -- the networked world as we
know it. Among the topics we'll touch on: intellectual property
conflicts, technical architecture and innovation, the evolution of
copyright, private vs. public interests in Net policy-making, lobbying
and the law, and more.
Disclaimer: the opinions expressed in this weblog are those of the authors and not of their respective institutions.
And if so, does that mean we should wave bye-bye or should we attempt to re-imagine how large chunks of idea will be communicated from (or between) an author and a mass literate audience? Personally I think we ought to do that latter, regardless of whether or not we think the book will survive. As I've argued before, new art forms are emerging and creators need to embrace and extend the opportunities available to them. Existing writers should continue to break out new experiments, and O'Reilly points out ways that his print press has done some of that.
There is some question as to whether these new things are "books" as we've come to understand them, but let's leave aside labeling for the moment and consider them as a form of creative expression. To make these expressions in new media requires new skills - O'Reilly talks about things like "crowdsourcing" for example - and audiences will need to find ways to acquire, appreciate, and respond to these new forms.
So, no, I don't think Tim (or any one organization) can re-invent something as fundamental as the book. We have over a thousand years of evolution of that art form already in hand and that millenium won't be toppled quickly. But collectively, yes, I do believe that we can employ new technologies to re-invent the book. Right now I'm watching my boys delve into comics and devour graphic novels the way I did as a child. I'm certain that what they give to their children as "books" will be different than what I'm passing down to them, but it will be something additional, not a full replacement.
I suspect books will lose most of their purely functional reasons for being (purely conveying information is faster, better, easier to do on the 'net), which just means that they'll become, as you say, 'art'. Books in the future will be more like those currently sold as "deluxe" or "limited edition", made in smaller lots of finer materials. In a completion of the circle back to the days of illuminated manuscripts, they will truly become object d'art.
1. PJ on May 4, 2009 2:25 PM writes...
I suspect books will lose most of their purely functional reasons for being (purely conveying information is faster, better, easier to do on the 'net), which just means that they'll become, as you say, 'art'. Books in the future will be more like those currently sold as "deluxe" or "limited edition", made in smaller lots of finer materials. In a completion of the circle back to the days of illuminated manuscripts, they will truly become object d'art.
Permalink to Comment