Here we'll explore the nexus of legal rulings, Capitol Hill
policy-making, technical standards development, and technological
innovation that creates -- and will recreate -- the networked world as we
know it. Among the topics we'll touch on: intellectual property
conflicts, technical architecture and innovation, the evolution of
copyright, private vs. public interests in Net policy-making, lobbying
and the law, and more.
Disclaimer: the opinions expressed in this weblog are those of the authors and not of their respective institutions.
There's really not much in his entry that will surprise long-time Copyfight readers, though I like his quoting Ecclesiastes. He touches on themes of self discovery and fan fiction and much more - I won't spoil it because you should read the original. It's a brilliant set of ideas to give to young artists and almost every one of those ideas violates some DRM policy or some copyright restriction somewhere. The lesson - the overall lesson that gives the essay its title - is that learning to do art is transgressive. To the degree that we crank down the screws of control we are stifling art, and destroying the learning process of new and undiscovered creative people everywhere. Rip, remix, release and in the process find your own voice and individual contribution to the stream in which we all swim.
Sorry to deflate your little balloon, but the article is not revolutionary or "transgressive", and none of it advocates massive violation of intellectual property law. It's a very conservative, staid, old-school essay that could have been written 50 or even 100 years ago, with appropriate word choice changes. I was hearing the same stuff in high school from English teachers and debate coaches--over 25 years ago.
Honestly, the whole world wasn't invented just last Thursday. Mr. Kleon is very correct--nothing is new, not even this allegedly "transgressive" stuff that the out-of-touch and narcissistic like to congratulate themselves about.
1. Bryan on April 4, 2011 5:20 PM writes...
Sorry to deflate your little balloon, but the article is not revolutionary or "transgressive", and none of it advocates massive violation of intellectual property law. It's a very conservative, staid, old-school essay that could have been written 50 or even 100 years ago, with appropriate word choice changes. I was hearing the same stuff in high school from English teachers and debate coaches--over 25 years ago.
Honestly, the whole world wasn't invented just last Thursday. Mr. Kleon is very correct--nothing is new, not even this allegedly "transgressive" stuff that the out-of-touch and narcissistic like to congratulate themselves about.
Permalink to Comment