Here we'll explore the nexus of legal rulings, Capitol Hill
policy-making, technical standards development, and technological
innovation that creates -- and will recreate -- the networked world as we
know it. Among the topics we'll touch on: intellectual property
conflicts, technical architecture and innovation, the evolution of
copyright, private vs. public interests in Net policy-making, lobbying
and the law, and more.
Disclaimer: the opinions expressed in this weblog are those of the authors and not of their respective institutions.
Back in January the first reports I read of this story had me wondering what the hell was going on. Anderson's current report makes clear that it has nothing to do with UK copyright laws and everything to do with the Cartel's ability to get law enforcement internationally to do its bidding. I truly feel sorry for Richard O'Dwyer - being treated like an international criminal mastermind because he posted a Web site full of links is beyond ludicrous.
The second story was highlighted on Friday by Cory for Boingboing, under the long but sadly accurate headline "RIAA prez twirls mustache in anticipation of taking on his role of Internet Witchfinder General". The gist of the piece is that the Cartel has used their captive Department of Justice and cowed your ISP into becoming its enforcement arms. If you do things they don't like, they'll cut you off from the net, or maybe they'll just slow your download speeds or drop your connection now and then. "Nice network you got there... be a shame if something happened to it."
Seriously, how fucked up is this? I think it's important to realize that "cutting off peoples' Internet access" doesn't just mean you can't download files. My kid requires the net to do his homework, which is posted by his schoolteachers on a series of blogs. My landline phone goes over my cable wire and is provided by my ISP. I doubt I'm unique in these things; Doctorow lists several other activities that modern life assumes people will have Internet for, such as banking and participating in political life. Losing Internet means losing all these and more.
I am reminded of a long-ago conversation Bruce Sterling and I had about his novel "Islands in the Net." The gist of it was the central thesis that access to the network was about to become like electricity - it's just assumed and you only tend to notice it when it's not there. I suspect that when the Cartel starts getting its way a whole lot of people are going to find this sudden absence troubling. Maybe if a lot of them are in the US Congress then we'll see some course-correction. But I tend to doubt it.
The MPAA and RIAA are not LAW ENFORCEMENT, they have no RIGHT to do this,
also the ISP's may be liable if they do this.
I would like to see everyone send a letter to their ISP, threating to Sue them for Invasion of
Privacy without a Court Order, and violating your Constitutional Rights.
Also Send a Letter or Call your Congress Man and Complain. Tell him if he allows this you will vote him out of Office.
Also Contact everyone you know and tell them to do the same.
Make your stand every where you can, or prepare to become the Slaves to your CORP Masters.
1. Chuck on March 20, 2012 1:28 AM writes...
The MPAA and RIAA are not LAW ENFORCEMENT, they have no RIGHT to do this,
also the ISP's may be liable if they do this.
I would like to see everyone send a letter to their ISP, threating to Sue them for Invasion of
Privacy without a Court Order, and violating your Constitutional Rights.
Also Send a Letter or Call your Congress Man and Complain. Tell him if he allows this you will vote him out of Office.
Also Contact everyone you know and tell them to do the same.
Permalink to CommentMake your stand every where you can, or prepare to become the Slaves to your CORP Masters.